There are always a lot of websites available that use the word "future" within their domain name, but are they really futurist type websites? It is advised often by print publishers and editors that the term "future" is a great word to use in titles, since it grabs people's attention. But, when people use the word future and then don't give predictions or future accounts, then are they really deceiving the viewer and web-surfer. I think they are.
Recently, an editor of another of things type website asked me to publish a column, but in reviewing the web site I came across it to be underwhelming on the futuristic side of things, and more heavy in to the scientific news arena. Indeed, if the magazine is seriously interested in "The Future" then why are typical the articles about new scientific innovations in today's period or happening today? - asked myself.
www.chatrush.com
raadpleger.nl
https://678-hd.com/
www.naiwaennet.com
It appears like they're seriously interested in scientific discovery that has already happened, not what'll maintain the future. That's just boring, more science news, regurgitation, typical human tactic of re-packaging information. I believe they are able to do better, but are holding themselves back, afraid to make people think, worried you will get too much from your mainstream, quote "core" band of viewers, which I think they don't even understand.
Needless to say, as an entrepreneur, I understand precisely why they get it done this way. It is because they want to generate income and thus sink to a lesser degree of readership, while still pretending to talk about the future of stuff. Once the editor wished to protect such comments, the indication was that your website was mostly about scientific news.
Yes, I notice that your website is certainly caused by a news site and I ask what does which have related to the future of stuff? Shouldn't the web site be called NSIN.com or something that way; for New Science Innovation News? If your website is approximately Science News and is a collection of everyone else's news, then it is really a copy site of a style that is already being used and not unique. Thus, the information is therefore exactly the same, so even when the articles are written more clearly and easier to understand, that is nice, still what's the worthiness to a "science news junky" as you will find very few articles on the internet site compared using their competition?
If they called their selves a news site, then you may have "futurist type columnists" anyway, who might project these scientific news items into the future or they might keep the "Future Stuff" motif and promote the futurist columnists.
This would be a training to all "Futuristic" type websites as an instance study. For the future thinkers to your website and have nothing to exhibit them, they'll leave. If you use trickery to get regular readers there, you're doing an extreme disservice to the future of mankind, by promoting present inventions as the be all end all. In either case, it's unethical to make use of this tactic on future of things type websites.
No comments:
Post a Comment